![]() “Smith & Wesson’s John Myles, CSX product manager, understood the market and its customers,” Beaudreau said. The angles, curves and transitions are smooth and intentional. Although such features might become a part of the CSX line one day, they do not complement deep concealment. Did you notice that there isn’t an optic cut or a rail? That was no accident. That same small design parameter is also why the gun lacks two more obvious features. According to S&W, single-action internals allowed engineers to build a slightly smaller gun than with a striker mechanism. There are two features that command attention: First, the CSX is a hammer-fired single action. × The ambidextrous slide-release and manual safety levers are recessed into the alloy frame, but are still reachable and usable. 30 Super Carry for a bump in capacity and its close-to-9mm ballistics. S&W representatives won’t verify it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if we eventually see CSX chamber Federal’s new. I don’t think that the CSX is going to take away from sales of the Shield, but I believe that it could almost render the. With a 3.1-inch barrel, 4.6-inch height, 1-inch width, 6-inch length, and 19 1/2-ounce weight, it isn’t much different dimensionally than the M&P9 Shield Plus ($553), but in the hand it feels smaller, and I think it would be a great fit for pocket carry. Obviously, the CSX is a compact that’s purpose-built for deep concealment and close engagements. They can be changed with a small, flat-tip screwdriver. ![]() ![]() Two opposing-side magazine release buttons are included. However, I think that the CSX will do well, especially among those who understand it. Many of us have accepted the proliferation of polymer-frame pistols, and some of us even like what they’ve become. The choices S&W made for its design were bold. Given the success of the Shield and EZ series, the new CSX has a lot to live up to. “Well, to be honest, ‘CSX’ is not directly tied to the Chief’s Special, but it does offer a slight nod to that legacy,” said Corey Beaudreau, media relations manager for Smith & Wesson. Its diminutive design is well suited for deep concealment uses such as pocket carry. Although its dimensions are comparable to Smith & Wesson’s striker-fired Shield pistols, the CSX is actually a smaller gun. Is the CSX a step backward for Smith & Wesson? Or did they identify an underserved market? Either way, everyone is talking about the unexpected CSX. But “CSX” suggests that the name and lineage was top of mind as an engineer sketched out the plans for the new compact, aluminum-frame, double-stack, single-action auto in 9mm. In the 16 years since, S&W has not applied the label to another model, and we’re not certain that it was the company’s intention to do that here. Those compact pistols were discontinued in 2002 (CS40) and 2006 (CS9/CS45) ahead of the launch of the polymer-frame M&P series. Though written out on the left side of the slide, “Chiefs Special” was abbreviated in the model name as “CS” for the CS9, CS40 and CS45. The company moved to using model numbers in 1957, but the name reappeared in 1999 on its 3rd Generation semiautos. ![]() Smith & Wesson’s sales team asked police chiefs to vote on a name for the revolver, and “.38 Chief’s Special” won. The revolver was introduced at the 1950 International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) conference. From its first use as a label for the J-Frame revolver, the “Chief’s Special” was an innovative approach to concealed carry.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |